Table 2 List of MAP Working Groups with chair or contact persons.
|
|
WG |
chair/contact |
|
|
1. |
FORM |
Hans Richner |
hans.richner@env.ethz.ch |
|
2. |
GAP |
Georg Mayr |
georg.mayr@uibk.ac.at |
|
3. |
Numerical Modelling (WG-NM) |
Evelyne Richard |
rice@aero.obs-mip.fr |
|
4. |
Forecasters Group (WG-FC) |
Peter Parson |
parson@zamg.ac.at |
|
5. |
Observational Networks and Mesoscale Climatology (WG-ROUND, MAC) |
Christian Häberli Carlo Cacciamani |
chi@meteoswiss.ch c.cacciamani@smr.arpa.emr.it |
|
6. |
Gravity Wave Breaking (WG-GWB) |
Adrian Broad |
asbroad@meto.gov.uk |
|
7. |
PV-Banners (WG-PVB) |
Ron B. Smith |
ronald.smith@yale.edu |
|
8. |
Hydrological Models (WG-HYD) |
Roberto Ranzi |
ranzi@bsing.ing.unibs.it |
|
9. |
Radar (WG-RAD) |
Frank Roux |
rouf@aero.obs-mip.fr |
|
10. |
Upper-level PV-Anomalies (WG-UPV) |
Klaus-Peter Hoinka |
klaus.hoinka@dlr.de |
|
11. |
Planetary Boundary Layer (WG-PBL) |
Mathias Rotach |
rotach@iac.umnw.ethz.ch |
|
12. |
Lidar (WG-LID) |
Cyrille Flamant |
flamant@lmd.polytechnique.fr |
FORM
The group chaired by Hans Richner and Reinhold Steinacker consists of approximately 20 members from following institutions:
• CNRM Toulouse, F
• ETH Zurich, CH
• IMG Vienna, A
• IMK Karlsruhe, D
• LA Lannemezan, F
• LMD Palaiseau, F
• Meteo Suisse Zurich and Payerne, CH
• Obs. Neuchatel, CH
• PSI Villigen, CH
• UIV Bregenz, A
• ZAMG Vienna, A
• 1st Meeting in Lochau, A, February 2000
• 2nd Meeting in Charmey, CH, October 2000
• 3rd Meeting held in Vienna, A, April 2001
• 4th Meeting scheduled in CH (Rhine Valley), November 8/9, 2001
• 5th Meeting scheduled in F, Spring 2002
GAP
The GAP working group evolved out of the people planning for, installing, and operating the measurement platforms in the Brenner target area. After the SOP the focus shifted to ascertaining the quality of the observations and providing them to the MDC. Recently the group was invited to become a formal working group. Since teams from the US, Canada, the UK, France, and Austria participate, meetings are held during international conferences with a MAP focus - once or twice a year. Most recently we met during the fabulous MAP meeting in Schliersee. An overview article for BAMS is in the internal review phase. Tasks for the GAP group are to provide the last not yet delivered data to the MDC, and to sift through all the data to find answers to the scientific objectives of GAP. The strategy is to distribute the analyses of all the intensively observed (with aircraft and Doppler lidar) cases among the partners. At the same time, we use idealized numerical simulations to study the key mechanisms and processes behind gap flow. The data set and the knowledge of the key processes we have so far identified will be a boon for “realistic” modelers who want to take their numerical models to the limits. The steep and narrow terrain together with the frequent sharp inversion on top of the gap flow layer are two of the main challenges. The next meeting of the GAP group will be in Park City at the Mountain Meteorology/MAP conference.
Numerical Modelling
The working group on Numerical Modelling decided to undertake an intercomparison exercise focused on the IOP2b situation aiming i) to assess and compare different high- resolution precipitation forecasts on the Lago Maggiore Target Area and ii) to evaluate their potential for improving flood forecasting. Six different non hydrostatic models (BOLAM, COAMPS, LM, MC2, MM5, Meso-NH) will be run using a common simulation protocole (horizontal resolution as close as possible to 2km, initial and boundary conditions taken from operational ECMWF analysis, 30- hour forecast starting on Sep 19,, 1200UTC, …). The model outputs will be made available on the MDC (in the format defined for the RAPHAEL EU project) and will be used as input for one and possibly two hydrological models. In addition, specific validation products will be defined with the help of the radar groups working on this situation. MAP-SOP model intercomparison (A. Buzzi) The Dept. of Physics of the Uni Genova group has undertaken a systematic model intercomparison of models that were run during the MAP SOP (see presentation of Arena et al. at MAP 2001). So raf, model data were processed for the following models for precipitation (6-12h) only: ECMWF, LM, BOLAM, SM, MC2. They are looking forward to receiving precip model output from other models, e.g. COAMPS, ALADIN, MM5, LAMBO, … The work will be repeated using updated MDC precip data, and applying more scores, also following any suggestion from the MAP community about best scores and best procedures to be applied.
Gravitiy wave breaking
There are four main groups working in the subject area of mountain forced gravity waves from the MAP-SOP. These are from Yale University, USA (led by Ron Smith), from NRL, Monterey, USA (Jim Doyle), from DLR, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany (led by Hans Volkert) and from the Met Office, UK (led by Adrian Broad). The working group has highlighted 3 IOP’s from the SOP for in-depth investigation: i) IOP2b - large amplitude trapped lee waves over Austria, ii) IOP13 - moderate amplitude lee waves over Mt Blanc, and iii) IOP15 - trapped lee waves and upwardly propagating longer waves over Monte Rosa.Linear and non-linear numerical models (Smith linear model and COAMPS) are being used, in conjunction with aircraft observational data, to investigate the complex dynamics involved in these cases. The linear model has been adapted to include an absorption factor at the bottom boundary in an attempt to represent the effect of the atmospheric boundary layer. Scientifically the working group aims to advance understanding of 3D mountain gravity waves from systematic analysis of the exceptional MAP- SOP observational dataset. Two further issues are of prime interest. Firstly to explore the predictability of mesoscale features such as non-hydrostatic gravity waves with very high resolution numerical models. Secondly there is an aim to utilize the observations and high resolution modeling studies to compare against, and improve, current subgridscale orographic parametrization schemes in NWP forecast models. A particular issue to address is the partitioning between partially resolved features and unresolved features which need parametrization. Systematic study of this partitioning is required as NWP model horizontal resolution increases, both in global and limited area models. Achievements to date have been an examination of IOP13 which has led to an appreciation of how the atmospheric boundary layer can modulate gravity wave amplitude and activity in high mountainous terrain. There are indications from IOP2b that the boundary layer is also playing a role in interacting with the gravity lee wave field in this case. Further investigations are on going in all cases.
PV-Banners
The PV-Banner Working Group met during the MAP2001 meeting in Schliersee, Bavaria. The items below summarize the MAP PV cases and research projects. PV Cases being studied from MAP are:
• IOP 4-Mistral
• IOP 8-Bavaria
• IOP 15- Mistral
• IOP 15- Po Valley
• IOP 15 -Bora
A partial list of research groups is given in . The additional issues discussed by the Working Group included:
• The quality of aircraft in situ data
• Model intercomparisons
• Email communications of progress and problems
• Coordinated publications
• Future overview paper on PV-Banners
• WG meeting in park City
• Leadership of the WG (V. Grubisic and C. Schär)
Table1 Partial list of research groups contributing in the WG PV banners.
|
Organization |
Staff |
Cases studied |
Model or approach |
MAP2001 |
|
CNRM |
Benech, Flament |
IOP 15-Mistral , Po |
MesoNH, MC2 |
|
|
DRI |
Grubisic |
IOP 8,15-Bora |
COAMPS |
Session IX |
|
ETH |
Schar, Schmidli |
IOP 4, 15-Po |
MC2 |
Session IX, B29 |
|
Leeds |
Mobbs, Ross, Pascoe |
Gap flow |
Blasius |
A9, A10 |
|
NCAR |
Rotunno |
? |
Theory |
|
|
NOAA |
Nance, Ralph |
? |
? |
|
|
NRL |
Doyle |
IOP 4, 8, 15-Mistral |
COAMPS |
A20 |
|
Italian Met Serv ice |
Frustaci |
IOP 5, 10 |
impacts |
A19 |
|
Vienna |
Steinacker |
15-Po |
impacts |
|
|
Yale |
Smith, Jiang |
IOP 4, 8, 15-Mistral |
COAMPS |
A20 |
Hydrological models (R.Ranzi)
Now the Technical Report on the experiments of hydrological interest (P3) in the Lago Maggiore Target Area is ready. The papers, indicated below, will soon be ready also as pdf files at the WG site http://www.ing.unibs.it/~dic- segr/maphyd.htm. The Report - each paper was revised by one reviewer, in most cases anonymous - aims at providing a description on when, where and how the measurements or the numerical experiments were conducted. This is a necessary and non sufficient condition for a successful scientific experiment, in the Galileo’s concept[1].
Sometimes on papers on scientific journals there is not sufficient space to describe the experiments in detail and our collection of papers, maybe not yet at a ‘top’ level, might help in better understanding how they are framed in the MAP-SOP experiment. The WG-HYD has been asked by the WG-NM to run hydrological models (WATFLOOD and DIMOSOP implemented at the time of the SOP and, maybe, others) forced by mesoscale models for the IOP-2 with the aim ‘to provide a quantitative assessment of high- resolution model capabilities in term of rain (and eventually flood) forecasting …’. In the group we will hope to find the resources to contribute to this experiment.
Hydrological aspects in the Mesoscale Alpine Programme- SOP experiment, Technical Report of the Department of Civile Engineering of the University of Brescia, Nr. 10, 2000, Brescia, May 2000, Edited by R. Ranzi and B. Bacchi
Ranzi, R., Hydrological aspects in the Mesoscale Alpine Programme-SOP experiment: an overview.
Zappa M., Matzinger N., Gurtz J., Hydrological and Meteorological Measurements at Claro (CH)- Lago Maggiore Target Area in the MAP-SOP 1999 RIVIERA experiment including first evaluation.
Falappi L., S. Barontini, A. Clerici, G. Grossi, E. Savoldi, R. Ranzi, Field and laboratory soil measurements in the Toce Valley (Italy), during the MAP-SOP 1999 TOCEX experiment.
Paloscia, S., G. Macelloni, P. Pampaloni, E. Santi, R. Ruisi Monitoring of soil moisture and vegetation biomass in the Toce Valley (Italy) by using micorwave radiometry.
Menziani M., S. Pugnaghi, S. Vincenzi, L. Pilan, Soil Moisture TDR Measurements at Pallanzeno - Lago Maggiore Target Area in the MAP-SOP 1999 TOCEX experiment.
Eccel, L. Sicher, Toller, G., The field and laboratory measurements of soil hydraulic properties in the MAP- SOP 1999 TOCEX experiment.
Obled, Ch. and A. Djerboua, Quantitative precipitation forecasts: a real time exercise during the MAP experiment.
Grossi, G., B. Bacchi, F. Gagni, R. Ranzi, Hydrometeorological monitoring in the Toce valley in the MAP-SOP 1999 TOCEX experiment.
Kouwen N. and J. Innes, Coupled MC2-Watflood flood forecasting.
Upper-level PV-anomalies
Work on PV-streamers is in progress at ETH/Zurich and DLR/Oberpfaffenhofen. The IOPs 15 and 17 of MAP-SOP are the key periods of interest. Recently a Diploma-thesis (ETH) and a PhD-thesis (DLR) were finished. At DLR DIAL data in combination with dropsonde data and numerical simulations (MESO-NH) are presently analyzed. During the SOP of MAP it was planned to perform a validation of the DIAL instrument, however, this was not carried out. Therefore, on 28.03.01 an experiment was performed in order to validate humidity data remotely sensed by the DIAL. This was done in cooperation with ETH/Zurich.
Planetary boundary layer
The working group as such has not been very active in the last months, mainly because its destiny (establishing contacts, defining scientific tasks, preparing specific experiments) seems to be fulfilled. The scientists of WG-PBL have, according to their involvement in the various projects dispersed into many other working groups (FORM, TOCEX, Po valley, Riviera). At the moment WG-PBL exists as an address list, which can be activated if necessary. MR will coordinate this and - as a first occasion - will try to stimulate an extract from the (yet to be built) literature list of MAP publications with an emphasis on boundary layer issues in complex terrain. As far as the Riviera project is concerned, which probably forms the project that was most specifically devoted to the research issues of WG-PBL, large efforts were undertaken for the preparation of post processed data and the establishment of a so-called Meta Data Report. This can be found on the net (http://www.geo.umnw. ethz.ch/research/ map_riviera/index.html) and will — among other things — serve as a ‘read-me file’ for the data to appear at the MDC (data will be made available in short time). Besides data analysis, a number of mesoscale numerical models are being used for the simulation of some of the R-IOPs (Riviera IOPs). As far as publications are concerned there is an overview paper for BAMS in its late stage of preparation. Also, some more technical papers are already in the review process. For 2002, a workshop organized by the Riviera community is planned, for which input from the other WG-PBL members will be sought.
[1]
did you
know that Benedetto Castelli, one of his fellows, who was born in Brescia,
did the first rainfall measurements, in Italy, for hydrological purposes?