Status reports of the MAP Working Groups

In the following the status of actively running MAP Working Groups as reported to the MSC in Schliersee are summarized. For more information on the MSC Meeting see P. Binder’s article “ Summary of the MAP Committee Meetings"  Note that not each of the MAP WGs (listed in Table 2) has submitted a summary.

Table 2       List of MAP Working Groups with chair or contact persons.

 

WG

chair/contact

email

1.

FORM

Hans Richner

hans.richner@env.ethz.ch

2.

GAP

Georg Mayr

georg.mayr@uibk.ac.at

3.

Numerical Modelling (WG-NM)

Evelyne Richard

rice@aero.obs-mip.fr

4.

Forecasters Group (WG-FC)

Peter Parson

parson@zamg.ac.at

5.

Observational Networks and Mesoscale Climatol­ogy (WG-ROUND, MAC)

Christian Häberli

Carlo Cacciamani

chi@meteoswiss.ch

c.cacciamani@smr.arpa.emr.it

6.

Gravity Wave Breaking (WG-GWB)

Adrian Broad

asbroad@meto.gov.uk

7.

PV-Banners (WG-PVB)

Ron B. Smith

ronald.smith@yale.edu

8.

Hydrological Models (WG-HYD)

Roberto Ranzi

ranzi@bsing.ing.unibs.it

9.

Radar (WG-RAD)

Frank Roux

rouf@aero.obs-mip.fr

10.

Upper-level PV-Anomalies (WG-UPV)

Klaus-Peter Hoinka

klaus.hoinka@dlr.de

11.

Planetary Boundary Layer (WG-PBL)

Mathias Rotach

rotach@iac.umnw.ethz.ch

12.

Lidar (WG-LID)

Cyrille Flamant

flamant@lmd.polytechnique.fr

 

FORM  

The group chaired by Hans Richner and Reinhold Steinacker consists of approximately 20 members from following institutions: 

       CNRM Toulouse, F

       ETH Zurich, CH

       IMG Vienna, A

       IMK Karlsruhe, D

       LA Lannemezan, F

       LMD Palaiseau, F

       Meteo Suisse Zurich and Payerne, CH

       Obs. Neuchatel, CH

       PSI Villigen, CH

       UIV Bregenz, A

       ZAMG Vienna, A

 

The key scientific issues are flow splitting, removal of cold air, and role of tributary valleys, with priorities IOP2, IOP8(+9+10), and IOP15. Feedback is given to DAQUA­MAP. Semiannual meetings are being held to exploit synergies and to streamline objectives:

       1st Meeting in Lochau, A, February 2000

       2nd Meeting in Charmey, CH, October 2000

       3rd Meeting held in Vienna, A, April 2001

       4th Meeting scheduled in CH (Rhine Valley), November 8/9, 2001

       5th Meeting scheduled in F, Spring 2002


For a list of joint publications see the FORM homepage at the MDC: http://www.map.ethz/form/title2.html ). The MAP-FORM-WG intends to coordinate submissions to AMS MMC/MAP2002.

GAP  

The GAP working group evolved out of the people planning for,  installing, and operating the measurement platforms in the Brenner target area. After the SOP the focus shifted to ascertaining the quality of the observations and providing them to the MDC. Recently the group was in­vited to become a formal working group. Since teams from the US, Canada, the UK, France, and Austria participate, meetings are held during international conferences with a MAP focus - once or twice a year. Most recently we met during the fabulous MAP meeting in Schliersee. An over­view article for BAMS is in the internal review phase. Tasks for the GAP group are to provide the last not yet de­livered data to the MDC, and to sift through all the data to find answers to the scientific objectives of GAP. The strategy is to distribute the analyses of all the intensively observed (with aircraft and Doppler lidar) cases among the partners. At the same time, we use idealized numerical simulations to study the key mechanisms and processes be­hind gap flow. The data set and the knowledge of the key processes we have so far identified will be a boon for “realistic” modelers who want to take their numerical models to the limits. The steep and narrow terrain together with the frequent sharp inversion on top of the gap flow layer are two of the main challenges. The next meeting of the GAP group will be in Park City at the Mountain Meteorology/MAP conference. 

 

Numerical Modelling  

The working group on Numerical Modelling decided to un­dertake an intercomparison exercise focused on the IOP2b situation aiming i) to assess and compare different high- resolution precipitation forecasts on the Lago Maggiore Target Area and ii) to evaluate their potential for improving flood forecasting. Six different non hydrostatic models (BOLAM, COAMPS, LM, MC2, MM5, Meso-NH) will be run using a common simulation protocole (horizontal reso­lution as close as possible to 2km, initial and boundary conditions taken from operational ECMWF analysis, 30- hour forecast starting on Sep 19,, 1200UTC, …). The model outputs will be made available on the MDC (in the format defined for the RAPHAEL EU project) and will be used as input for one and possibly two hydrological models. In addition, specific validation products will be defined with the help of the radar groups working on this situation. MAP-SOP model intercomparison (A. Buzzi) The Dept. of Physics of the Uni Genova group has undertaken a systematic model intercomparison of models that were run during the MAP SOP (see presentation of Arena et al. at MAP 2001). So raf, model data were processed for the following models for precipitation (6-12h) only: ECMWF, LM, BOLAM, SM, MC2. They are looking forward to re­ceiving precip model output from other models, e.g. COAMPS, ALADIN, MM5, LAMBO, … The work will be repeated using updated MDC precip data, and applying more scores, also following any suggestion from the MAP community about best scores and best procedures to be applied. 

 

Gravitiy wave breaking  

There are four main groups working in the subject area of mountain forced gravity waves from the MAP-SOP. These are from Yale University, USA (led by Ron Smith), from NRL, Monterey, USA (Jim Doyle), from DLR, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany (led by Hans Volkert) and from the Met Office, UK (led by Adrian Broad). The working group has highlighted 3 IOP’s from the SOP for in-depth investi­gation: i) IOP2b - large amplitude trapped lee waves over Austria, ii) IOP13 - moderate amplitude lee waves over Mt Blanc, and iii) IOP15 - trapped lee waves and upwardly propagating longer waves over Monte Rosa.Linear and non-linear numerical models (Smith linear model and COAMPS) are being used, in conjunction with aircraft observational data, to investigate the complex dy­namics involved in these cases. The linear model has been adapted to include an absorption factor at the bottom boundary in an attempt to represent the effect of the atmos­pheric boundary layer. Scientifically the working group aims to advance understanding of 3D mountain gravity waves from systematic analysis of the exceptional MAP- SOP observational dataset. Two further issues are of prime interest. Firstly to explore the predictability of mesoscale features such as non-hydrostatic gravity waves with very high resolution numerical models. Secondly there is an aim to utilize the observations and high resolution modeling studies to compare against, and improve, current subgridscale orographic parametrization schemes in NWP forecast models. A particular issue to address is the partitioning be­tween partially resolved features and unresolved features which need parametrization. Systematic study of this parti­tioning is required as NWP model horizontal resolution in­creases, both in global and limited area models. Achievements to date have been an examination of IOP13 which has led to an appreciation of how the atmospheric boundary layer can modulate gravity wave amplitude and activity in high mountainous terrain. There are indications from IOP2b that the boundary layer is also playing a role in interacting with the gravity lee wave field in this case. Fur­ther investigations are on going in all cases. 

PV-Banners 

The PV-Banner Working Group met during the MAP2001 meeting in Schliersee, Bavaria. The items below summarize the MAP PV cases and research projects. PV Cases be­ing studied from MAP are:

       IOP 4-Mistral

       IOP 8-Bavaria

       IOP 15- Mistral

       IOP 15- Po Valley

       IOP 15 -Bora

 

A partial list of research groups is given in . The additional issues discussed by the Working Group included:

       The quality of aircraft in situ data

       Model intercomparisons

       Email communications of progress and problems

       Coordinated publications

       Future overview paper on PV-Banners

       WG meeting in park City

       Leadership of the WG (V. Grubisic and C. Schär)

 

Table1 Partial list of research groups contributing in the WG PV banners.

Organization

Staff

Cases studied

Model or approach

MAP2001

CNRM

Benech, Flament

IOP 15-Mistral , Po

MesoNH, MC2

 

DRI

Grubisic

IOP 8,15-Bora

COAMPS

Session IX

ETH

Schar, Schmidli

IOP 4, 15-Po

MC2

Session IX, B29

Leeds

Mobbs, Ross, Pascoe

Gap flow

Blasius

A9, A10

NCAR

Rotunno

?

Theory

 

NOAA

Nance, Ralph

?

?

 

NRL

Doyle

IOP 4, 8, 15-Mistral

COAMPS

A20

Italian Met Serv ice

Frustaci

IOP 5, 10

impacts

A19

Vienna

Steinacker

15-Po

impacts

 

Yale

Smith, Jiang

IOP 4, 8, 15-Mistral

COAMPS

A20

 

Hydrological models (R.Ranzi)

Now the Technical Report on the experiments of hydrological interest (P3) in the Lago Maggiore Target Area is ready. The papers, indicated below, will soon be ready also as pdf files at the WG site http://www.ing.unibs.it/~dic- segr/maphyd.htm. The Report - each paper was revised by one reviewer, in most cases anonymous - aims at providing a description on when, where and how the measurements or the numerical experiments were conducted. This is a necessary and non sufficient condition for a successful sci­entific experiment, in the Galileo’s concept[1].

Sometimes on papers on scientific journals there is not sufficient space to describe the experiments in detail and our collection of papers, maybe not yet at a ‘top’ level, might help in better understanding how they are framed in the MAP-SOP experiment. The WG-HYD has been asked by the WG-NM to run hydrological models (WATFLOOD and DIMOSOP implemented at the time of the SOP and, maybe, others) forced by mesoscale models for the IOP-2 with the aim ‘to provide a quantitative assessment of high- resolution model capabilities in term of rain (and eventu­ally flood) forecasting …’. In the group we will hope to find the resources to contribute to this experiment.

Hydrological aspects in the Mesoscale Alpine Programme- SOP experiment, Technical Report of the Department of Civile Engineering of the University of Brescia, Nr. 10, 2000, Brescia, May 2000, Edited by R. Ranzi and B. Bacchi

  1. Ranzi, R., Hydrological aspects in the Mesoscale Alpine Programme-SOP experiment: an overview.

  2. Zappa M., Matzinger N., Gurtz J., Hydrological and Me­teorological Measurements at Claro (CH)- Lago Maggiore Target Area in the MAP-SOP 1999 RIVIERA experiment including first evaluation.

  3. Falappi L., S. Barontini, A. Clerici, G. Grossi, E. Sa­voldi, R. Ranzi, Field and laboratory soil measurements in the Toce Valley (Italy), during the MAP-SOP 1999 TOCEX experiment.

  4. Paloscia, S., G. Macelloni, P. Pampaloni, E. Santi, R. Ruisi Monitoring of soil moisture and vegetation biomass in the Toce Valley (Italy) by using micorwave radiometry.

  5. Menziani M., S. Pugnaghi, S. Vincenzi, L. Pilan, Soil Moisture TDR Measurements at Pallanzeno - Lago Maggiore Target Area in the MAP-SOP 1999 TOCEX experi­ment.

  6. Eccel, L. Sicher, Toller, G., The field and laboratory measurements of soil hydraulic properties in the MAP- SOP 1999 TOCEX experiment.

  7. Obled, Ch. and A. Djerboua, Quantitative precipitation forecasts: a real time exercise during the MAP experiment.

  8. Grossi, G., B. Bacchi, F. Gagni, R. Ranzi, Hydrometeorological monitoring in the Toce valley in the MAP-SOP 1999 TOCEX experiment.

  9. Kouwen N. and J. Innes, Coupled MC2-Watflood flood forecasting.

  10. Montaldo, M., V. Toninelli, M. Mancini, J. D. Albert­son and P. A. Troch, Estimation of actual evapotranspiration and soil moisture in the Pieve Vergonte case study.
  11. Tagliazucca, M., U. Giostra, L. Falappi, Measurements of turbulent fluxes in the surface layer in the Domodossola- Siberia site during the MAP-SOP 1999 TOCEX experiment. 

 

Upper-level PV-anomalies 

Work on PV-streamers is in progress at ETH/Zurich and DLR/Oberpfaffenhofen. The IOPs 15 and 17 of MAP-SOP are the key periods of interest. Recently a Diploma-thesis (ETH) and a PhD-thesis (DLR) were finished. At DLR DIAL data in combination with dropsonde data and numerical simulations (MESO-NH) are presently analyzed. Dur­ing the SOP of MAP it was planned to perform a validation of the DIAL instrument, however, this was not carried out. Therefore, on 28.03.01 an experiment was performed in order to validate humidity data remotely sensed by the DIAL. This was done in cooperation with ETH/Zurich. 

 

Planetary boundary layer 

The working group as such has not been very active in the last months, mainly because its destiny (establishing contacts, defining scientific tasks, preparing specific experiments) seems to be fulfilled. The scientists of WG-PBL have, according to their involvement in the various projects dispersed into many other working groups (FORM, TOCEX, Po valley, Riviera). At the moment WG-PBL exists as an address list, which can be activated if necessary. MR will coordinate this and - as a first occasion - will try to stimulate an extract from the (yet to be built) literature list of MAP publications with an emphasis on boundary layer issues in complex terrain. As far as the Riviera project is concerned, which probably forms the project that was most specifically devoted to the research issues of WG-PBL, large efforts were undertaken for the preparation of post processed data and the establish­ment of a so-called Meta Data Report. This can be found on the net (http://www.geo.umnw. ethz.ch/research/ map_riviera/index.html) and will — among other things — serve as a ‘read-me file’ for the data to appear at the MDC (data will be made available in short time). Besides data analysis, a number of mesoscale numerical models are be­ing used for the simulation of some of the R-IOPs (Riviera IOPs). As far as publications are concerned there is an overview paper for BAMS in its late stage of preparation. Also, some more technical papers are already in the review process. For 2002, a workshop organized by the Riviera community is planned, for which input from the other WG-PBL members will be sought.



[1]  did you know that Benedetto Castelli, one of his fellows, who was born in Brescia, did the first rainfall measurements, in Italy, for hydrological purposes?



© MAP Data Centre - July '01 - MAP WebMaster