REMARK: The proposed set-ups of observational means are first guesses. They will be detailed in the MAP Implementation Plan.
Many national and regional, meteorological and hydrological institutions in the Alpine area operate surface observation networks. Only a subset of the routinely made measurements are exchanged over international communication channels. It is one of the ambitions of MAP to make available to the scientific community as many of these data as possible. This applies for past periods of particular interest to MAP as well as for the SOP in particular. A special working group has become active to identify the existing surface observational networks and to build a data base of this inventory.
Figure 3-1 shows the result of such an effort for the stations which record in an automatic mode and/or transmit in real-time a basic set of meteorological parameters. It is easily recognized that the Alpine region may probably be the most densely instrumented mountain area in the world.
The network for climatological precipitation recordings is depicted in Fig. 3-2. The large majority of these stations measures daily precipitation sums and the readings are available only in delayed mode. However, automatic and real-time measuring rain gauge stations are included as well.

Figure 3-1. Network of stations observing a basic set of meteorological parameters with
automatic recording and/or real-time data transmission capabilities.

Figure 3-2. Precipitation measuring network in the Alpine region. Most of these stations
report daily sums in delayed mode. (map based on Frei and Schär, 1998)

Figure 3-3. Upper-air observation network in the Alpine region
(o: radiosounding stations. +: wind profiling radars (UHF and VHF);
#: permanently installed RASS; @: permanently installed (Doppler) sodar). The
radiosounding stations at Ajaccio (Corsica), Cagliari (Sardinia) and Las Palmas de
Mallorca (Balearic Islands) are outside the frame of the display but will play an
important role for MAP. The radiosonde stations at Nice, Alessandria and Verona and the
windprofilers at Annecy and Turbigo are temporary MAP instruments. Additional
instrumentation of this type will be set up in the target areas and are detailed in later
figures. The ellipsis indicates the location of the Rhine Valley target area, where
several radiosounding stations and windprofilers will be concentrated
Figure 3-3 gives an impression of the upper-air network in the Alpine region. During the SOP the routinely operating sites will be supplemented by a number of additional stations. Furthermore, most of the radiosounding stations displayed will launch four ascents per day during the periods of special interest to MAP.
Table 3-1.Supplemental "vertically pointing" observations in the Alpine region (target area instrumentation not included); fs: funding status (u: uncertain, p: proposed/pending, ok), ls: location status (f: fix, t: transportable, m: mobile). In the "interest" column the following abbreviations are used: GEN=general; GW=gravity waves; HYD=hydrology; PBL=planetary boundary layer; ULF=upper level features.
country |
group |
instrument |
# |
fs |
ls |
interest |
location |
remarks |
| Austria | Austro Control | UHF WP | 1 | ok | f | GEN, PBL | Vienna | |
| Austria | Austro Control | UHF WP | 1 | p | f | GEN, PBL, gap flow | Innsbruck | mid 1999 |
| France | LAMP | VHF WP | 1 | ok | f | GEN, ULF, GW | Clermont Fd | |
| France | LA | VHF WP | 1 | ok | t | GEN, ULF, GW | near Geneva | best location in France |
| France | LSEET | VHF WP | 1 | ok | f | GEN, ULF, GW | Toulon | |
| France | LSEET | mini-VHF WP | 1 | ok | f | wake, PBL | Toulon | flow splitting |
| France | Meteo France/CNRM | UHF WP + RASS | 1 | ok | t | GEN, PBL, precip | Lago Maggiore | |
| France | Meteo France/CNRM | VHF WP | 1 | ok | t | GEN, ULF, GW | Lago Maggiore | best location |
| France | SA | VHF WP | 1 | ok | f | GEN, ULF, GW | St. Michel de Provence | |
| Italy | ENEL | RASS | 1 | p | f | PBL, precip | Milano | good Po-Valley coverage |
| Italy | ENEL | RASS | 1 | p | f | PBL, precip | Fusina | good Po-Valley coverage |
| Italy | ENEL | RASS | 1 | p | f | PBL, precip | Ostiglia | good Po-Valley coverage |
| Italy | ENEL | RASS | 1 | p | f | PBL, precip | Turbigo | good Po-Valley coverage |
| Italy | ENEL | RASS | 1 | p | t | PBL, precip | Lago Maggiore | |
| Austria | ZAMG | Doppler sodar | 1 | ok | f | PBL | NE-border | semi-opr |
| Italy | ENEL | sodar | 1 | p | f | PBL, precip | Turbigo | good Po-Valley coverage |
| Italy | ENEL | sodar | 1 | p | f | PBL, precip | Alessandria | good Po-Valley coverage |
| Italy | ENEL | sodar | 1 | p | f | PBL, precip | Cameri | good Po-Valley coverage |
| Italy | ENEL | sodar | 1 | p | f | PBL, precip | Torino | good Po-Valley coverage |
| Italy | ENEL | sodar | 1 | p | f | PBL, precip | Milano | good Po-Valley coverage |
| Italy | ENEL | sodar | 1 | p | f | PBL, precip | Ostiglia | good Po-Valley coverage |
| Italy | ENEL | sodar | 1 | p | f | PBL, precip | Fusina | good Po-Valley coverage |
| Italy | ENEL | sodar | 1 | p | f | PBL, precip | Porto Tolle | good Po-Valley coverage |
In order to illustrate the overall coverage of the region the fixed installations managed by research institutions and normally operating only temporarily are also indicated (in parentheses). The detailed instrumental set-ups of the target areas are not included in these figures. They are illustrated by close-up schematics later in this document.
In addition to the radiosounding stations also sites equipped with wind profiling radars (windprofilers) are given in Fig. 3-3.
The devices installed at Annecy and Turbigo are temporary installations whilst all other windprofilers have their fix locations. There are still other instruments probing the vertical dimension.
Apart from radiosounding and windprofilers the permanent radio acoustic sounding systems (RASS) and (Doppler) sodars are also displayed in Fig. 3-3. A summary of all "vertically pointing" systems is given in Table 3-1 (special equipment of the target areas not included).
The Alpine region is observed by a network of weather radar stations. These stations, both operational and research, are depicted in Fig. 3-4. Most radars have Doppler capabilities, with the exception of the French radars, the Slovenian radar and the Italian radars at Spino d°Adda and Istrana. The Italian radars at San Pietro (Bologna), Fossalon di Grado (Cervignano del Friuli), Pisa, and the German radar at DLR Oberpfaffenhofen have even polarization capabilities. The Fossalon di Grado radar can be switched from its operational to a research-dedicated scanning mode on demand.

Figure 3-4. Weather radar stations in the Alpine area. Radars operated by research
institutions for special periods are written in parentheses. Additional research radars
will be set up in the Lago Maggiore target area the location of which is indicated by the
ellipsis. The Doppler radar at Monte Rasu in Sardinia is
From climatology (cf. sect. 2.1.1) it becomes evident that the local precipitation maxima on the southern slope of the Alps are tied to indentations in the mountain range (for precipitation amounts and for frequency of heavy precipitation). Distinct maxima occur in the Lago Maggiore area (canton of Ticino and northern part of Regione Piemonte) and in a region straddling the Italian-Slovenian border in the north-eastern part of Italy (Friuli) (Fig. 2-2). From this latter maximum a distinct zone of enhanced precipitation extends westwards along the southern slope of the Alps into the region of Veneto.
To tackle the scientific questions related to heavy precipitation:
A target area is equipped with supplemental ground-based instruments, temporarily installed for the MAP SOP. By definition a target area is geographically fixed. A particularly careful selection is needed in order to maximise the probability of occurrence of the meteorological phenomena to be investigated during the SOP. Ground-based observation campaigns are supported by airborne missions over the target area.
A mission area is a region featuring increased frequency of occurrence of the phenomena in question. But in contrast to the target area it is not equipped with additional ground-based instrumentation but is a preferred candidate for research aircraft missions.
A map of the Lago Maggiore target area is provided in Fig. 3-5. This area is best suited to study all aspects related to heavy orographic precipitation. The observational devices which will be installed in the Lago Maggiore target area during the SOP are listed in the following tables (for legend of table columns cf. header of Table 3-1). They will deserve the following interests:
In addition to the ground-based measurements the deployment of research aircraft for in-situ and remote-sensing observations constitute a cornerstone of the overall experimental set-up: Electra (ELDORA/ASTRAIA), P-3, Fokker (LEANDRE II).

Figure 3-5. Tentative layout of the Lago Maggiore target area.
Table 3-2. Extra upper-air observations in the Lago Maggiore target area (see legend in Table 3-1).
country |
group |
instrument |
# |
fs |
ls |
interst |
location |
remarks |
| Italy | ICG-CNR, Torino | raso | 1 | p | m | GEN, precip | Lago Maggiore, Ligurian gap | operational (>= 4/d) |
| Switzerland | GIETH | raso | 1 | p | t | GEN, PBL, HYD | Lago Maggiore | IOPs |
| France | Meteo France/CNRM | VHF WP | 1 | ok | t | GEN, ULF, GW | Lago Maggiore | best location |
| Italy | IFA-CNR, Roma | lidar | 1 | p | t | GW | Lago Maggiore |
Table 3-3. Dynamics and microphysics of precipitation systems (see legend in Table 3-1).
country |
group |
instrument |
# |
fs |
ls |
interest |
location |
remarks |
| France | CETP | Ronsard Doppler radar | 1 | ok | t | precip | Lago Maggiore | |
| Switzerland | MeteoSwiss | Doppler radar | 1 | ok | f | precip | Lago Maggiore | operational, Mt. Lema |
| USA | NCAR | S-POL Doppler radar | 1 | p | t | precip, microphysics | Lago Maggiore | 8.5m antenna |
| Germany | IMK Karlsruhe | vert. pointing Doppler radar (K) | 1 | ok | m | precip | Lago Maggiore | 8 height steps, resolution 20-200m |
| Switzerland | IACETH | vert. radar on van (X) | 1 | p | m | precip | Lago Maggiore | |
| USA | NCAR | Doppler radar on wheels (X) | 1 | p | m | precip | Lago Maggiore | being discussed |
| Germany | IMK Karlsruhe | disdrometer | 1 | ok | m | precip, microphysics | Lago Maggiore | Joss/Waldvogel |
| Germany | IMK Karlsruhe | optical disdrometer | 2 | ok | m | precip, microphysics | Lago Maggiore | Loeffler-Mang, size and velocity |
Table 3-4. Supplemental PBL equipment in the Lago Maggiore target area (see legend in Table 3-1).
country |
group |
instrument |
# |
fs |
ls |
interest |
location |
remarks |
| France | Meteo France/CNRM | UHF WP + RASS | 1 | ok | t | GEN, PBL, precip | Lago Maggiore | |
| Italy | CNR Bologna | surface energy balance | 2 | ok | t | PBL | Lago Maggiore | |
| Italy | ENEL | Doppler sodar | 1 | p | m | PBL, precip | Lago Maggiore | |
| Italy | ENEL | RASS | 1 | p | t | PBL, precip | Lago Maggiore | |
| Italy | ENEL | tethered balloon | 1 | p | t | PBL | Lago Maggiore | |
| Italy | ISAO-CNR, Bologna | radiation balance | 1 | ok | t | PBL, HYD | Lago Maggiore | |
| Italy | IFA-CNR, Roma | Doppler sodar | 1 | p | t | PBL, precip | Lago Maggiore | |
| Italy | IFA-CNR, Roma | tethered balloon | 1 | p | t | PBL | Lago Maggiore | |
| Italy | ISIATA-CNR, Lecce | Doppler sodar | 1 | p | t | PBL, precip | Lago Maggiore | |
| Italy | varia | sonic anemometer | 6 | p | t | PBL | Lago Maggiore | |
| Switzerland | GIETH | KH 20 (latent heat fluxes) | 2 | p | t | PBL | Lago Maggiore | on tower |
| Switzerland | GIETH | meteo tower (30m, fluxes, radiation) | 1 | p | t | PBL, HYD | Lago Maggiore | SOP |
| Switzerland | GIETH | meteo tower (30m, fluxes, telescopic) | 1 | p | m | PBL, HYD | Lago Maggiore | SOP |
| Switzerland | GIETH | meteo tower (5m, fluxes) | 2 | p | p | PBL, HYD | Lago Maggiore | SOP |
| Switzerland | GIETH | scintillometer (vert. fluxes) | 1 | ok | t | PBL | Lago Maggiore | IOPs |
| Switzerland | GIETH | sonic anemometer | 5 | p | t | PBL | Lago Maggiore | on tower |
Table 3-5. Special observations for hydrology (see legend in Table 3-1).
country |
group |
instrument |
# |
fs |
ls |
interest |
location |
remarks |
| Italy | Uni Brescia | gravimetric soil moisture measurement | 1 | ok | f | HYD | Brescia for Lago Maggiore | |
| Italy | nat./reg. hydrographic services | telehydrometer | 5 | ok | f | HYD | Lago Maggiore | real time |
| Italy | variaa) | TDR reflectometer | 5 | p | t | HYD, PBL | Lago Maggiore | |
| Italy | IROE-CNR | 1.4, 6.8 GHz and 8-14 mm IR antenna | 1 | p | m | HYD | Lago Maggiore | airborne |
| Switzerland | GIETH | TDR reflectometer | 1 | p | t | HYD, PBL | Lago Maggiore | |
| Switzerland | nat. hydrological service | telehydrometer | 6 | ok | f | HYD | Lago Maggiore | |
| EU | JRC, Ispra | TDR | 1 | p | t | HYD, PBL | Lago Maggiore |
a)
Politecnico di Milano (1), Istituto Agrario di S. Michele all'Adige (1), Uni Modena (2), Uni Brescia (1)Table 3-6. Atmospheric electricity measurements (see legend in Table 3-1).
country |
group |
instrument |
# |
fs |
ls |
interest |
location |
remarks |
| France | LA | electrical measurements | 1 | u | t | precip | Lago Maggiore | other funds needed, uncertain |
Given the good coverage of the Po Valley by PBL instruments and in particular of the Lago Maggiore area during the SOP, the conditions for initiation of mesoscale convective systems are best observed and documented there. However, developing and moving systems can be tracked by aircraft and the high-technology standard Doppler radars all over the Po Valley. Particularly good observations will be possible, when the systems move over the ground-based target area.
This area is well covered by the operational Doppler radars near Bologna, Teolo, at Noventa di Piave and Cervignano del Friuli and the non-Doppler at Istrana with significant overlap of the scanning ranges of the Doppler radars. Furthermore the region is well covered by surface station networks as well as by a number of remote-sensing boundary layer instruments. In Slovenia an additional weather radar station will be set up for the time of the SOP. An overview is presented in Fig. 3-6.
Due to the excellent "background coverage" by operational instrumentation, no additional ground-based instrumentation is installed in this mission area. Rather it is proposed for airborne missions given the occurrence of important precipitation events.
However, one mobile upper-air sounding station for inflow probing as well as for upstream-measurements for the gap-flow studies (Brenner pass) is currently planned at Verona.

Figure 3-6. Layout of the north-east Italian / Slovenian mission area. Surface stations:
see inset legend; Radiosoundings at Udine, Ljubljana and Verona; radar stations at Monte
Grande, Noventa di Piave; Istrana, Fossalon die Grado and in western Slovenia;
#: permanently installed RASS (Ostiglia); @: permanently installed (Doppler)
sodar (Ostiglia, Porto Tolle, Fusina).
The Rhine Valley between the town of Chur and the Lake of Constance is selected as target area for the investigations of the unstationary aspects of Foehn in a large valley and the interaction with the pre-existing PBL. The main arguments are the following:
Fig. 3-7 illustrates the mean occurrence of Foehn during fall at a sample of Foehn-prone climatological stations in Switzerland. The basis of these statistics is the number of observations with Foehn where observations are made three times daily at 07, 13 and 19 local time. In Fig. 3-8 the probability of the occurrence of a given number of Foehn observations at Vaduz during the SOP season (15 August to 15 November) is illustrated. These statistics are based on a 26 year (1971-1996) record with three observations daily. The probability to have more than at least 6 Foehn observations is higher than 80 % (60 % for at least 12 events). The probability curve does not attain 100 % since no Foehn event occurred in 1978. However, general Foehn flow over the Alps is more frequent than these numbers suggest, since during autumn cold air in the valley floor may hinder the touch down of the Foehn to the ground. From the same data record it can be deduced that short Foehn episodes are more frequent than long-lasting periods (Fig. 3-9).

Figure 3-7. Mean number of Foehn observations during the fall season (Sept., Oct., Nov.)
at a selection of meteorological stations in Switzerland (long-term records). Observations
are carried out daily at 07, 13 and 19 local time; Rhine Valley. (courtesy of S. Bader)

Figure 3-8. Probability of a given number of Foehn observations (07/13/19 local time) to
occur at Vaduz during the SOP season (15 August to 15 November). (courtesy of M. Bolliger,
MeteoSwiss).

Figure 3-9. Number of events with a given number of consecutive Foehn observations
(07/13/19 local time) at Vaduz. (courtesy of M. Bolliger, MeteoSwiss).
The Rhine Valley is a multi-national target area (A/CH/D/FL) and less investigated than the Reuss Valley (Gotthard). The upstream topography may be more complex, although it seems, that the Lago Maggiore area is in many cases of SW to S flow favourably located upstream of the Rhine Valley as it is for the Reuss Valley.
An outline of the Rhine Valley target area is given in Fig. 3-10. The summary of special equipment installed during the SOP is listed in Table 3-7. Furthermore aircraft will be deployed to study the flow structure, vertical fluxes and turbulence. Stemme and Merlin are the candidate aircraft.
Table 3-7. Extra instruments in the Rhine Valley target area (see legend in Table 3-1).
country |
group |
instrument |
# |
fs |
ls |
interest |
location |
remarks |
| Austria | Uni Vienna ZAMG | Doppler sodar | 1 | p | t | PBL, Foehn | Rhine Valley | |
| Austria | Uni Vienna | instrumentd car | 1 | u | m | PBL, Foehn | Rhine Valley | sensors, GPS, PCs |
| Austria | Uni Vienna | pilot balloon | 2 | ok | m | PBL, Foehn | Rhine Valley | 2 special theodolites each |
| Austria | Uni Vienna | special cameras | 4 | ok | t | PBL, Foehn | Rhine Valley | more than simple video |
| Austria | Uni Vienna | surface station | 5 | ok | m | PBL, Foehn | Rhine Valley | not high accuracy |
| Austria | ZAMG | Doppler sodar | 2 | u | t | PBL, Foehn | Rhine Valley | |
| Austria | ZAMG | eddy corr. system | 1 | u | t | PBL, Foehn | Rhine Valley | |
| Austria | ZAMG | kite (6 sondes) | 1 | u | m | PBL, Foehn | Rhine Valley | |
| Austria | ZAMG | surface station | 1-2 | u | t | PBL, Foehn | Rhine Valley | TAWES like |
| France | CNES/LA | CLB | 1 | p | t | GEN, Foehn,wake | Rhine Valley | trans-Alpine trajectories, cooperation with MeteoSwiss |
| France | CNRM | surface station barograph | 15 | u | t | PBL, Foehn, drag | Rhine Valley | |
| France | LMD | scanning Doppler lidar | 1 | ok | t | PBL, Foehn | Rhine Valley | |
| Germany | IMK Karlsruhe | UHF WP + RASS | 1 | u | t | PBL, Foehn | Rhine Valley | T, ff, dd; dt=30°, dz=60m, ztop~=4km |
| Switzerland | Army | raso P760 | 2 | ok | t/m | GEN, Foehn | Alpine crest, Rhine Valley | full raso |
| Switzerland | Army | raso P763 | 4 | ok | m | GEN, Foehn | Rhine Valley | simple raso (T, ff, dd) |
| Switzerland | IACETH/MeteoSwiss | microbarograph | ~5 | u | t | Foehn, wave structure, drag | Rhine Valley | modified ANETZ stations |
| Switzerland | IACETH | Doppler sodar | 1 | ok | t | PBL, Foehn | Rhine Valley | |
| Switzerland | IACETH | raso | 1 | ok | t | GEN, Foehn | Rhine Valley | |
| Switzerland | Meteolabor | raso P763 | 1 | u | m | GEN, Foehn | Rhine Valley | simple raso (T, ff, dd) |
| Switzerland | Obs. Neuchatel | Upw. lidar | 1 | u | t | Foehn | Rhine Valley | aerosol, H2O,(T) |
| Switzerland | MeteoSwiss AER | UHF WP | 1 | p | t | GEN, PBL, Foehn | Rhine Valley, Alpine crest | during IOPs |
| Switzerland | MeteoSwiss ENV | Doppler sodar | 2 | p | t | PBL, Foehn | Rhine Valley | |
| Switzerland | MeteoSwiss ENV | MADD automatic station | 2-4 | p | t | PBL, Foehn | Rhine Valley | ptu, ff, dd, RR, rad |
| Switzerland | MeteoSwiss ENV | raso/CLB | 1 | p | t | GEN, Foehn, wake | Rhine Valley | raso or CLB, trans-Alpine trajectories, coop. with CNES/LA |
| Switzerland | MeteoSwiss ENV | video cameras | 2-4 | p | t | GEN, PBL, Foehn | Rhine Valley |

Figure 3-10. Tentative layout of the Rhine Valley target area.
The Brenner pass is by far the deepest gap in the Alpine chain. This makes it the target area for the investigation of gap flow and shallow Foehn. The Wipptal which is on the Austrian side of the Brenner pass, will be equipped with different types of additional in-situ (meteorological surface stations, microbarographs, radiosoundings) and remote-sensing (UHF profiler, NCAR scanning Doppler lidar) instruments. Deployment of the Merlin and Fokker, the Electra and the P-3 are also advisable to probe the structure of the flow through the gap.
The list of special instruments deployed in the Brenner target area is given in Table 3-8. An overview map is displayed in Fig. 3-11.
Table 3-8. Extra instruments in the Brenner target area (see legend in Table 3-1).
country |
group |
instrument |
# |
fs |
ls |
interest |
location |
remarks |
| Austria | Austro Control | UHF WP | 1 | p | f | GEN, PBL, gap flow | Innsbruck | |
| Austria | Austro Control | raso | 1 | ok | f | GEN, gap flow | Innsbruck | operational (>= 4/d) |
| Austria | Uni Bodenkultur | mini flux towers | 3 | p | t | PBL, gap flow | Innsbruck | |
| Austria | Uni Bodenkultur | Doppler sodar | 1 | p | t | PBL, gap flow | Innsbruck | |
| Austria | Uni Bodenkultur | mini Doppler sodar | 2 | p | m | PBL, gap flow | Innsbruck | |
| Austria | Uni Innsbruck | flux and radiation | 1 | p | t | PBL | MOC Brenner | |
| Austria | Uni Innsbruck | instrumented car | 2 | ok | m | gap flow, PBL | Brenner | |
| Austria | Uni Innsbruck | surface station | 14 | ok | t | gap flow | Brenner | |
| Austria | Uni Innsbruck/Vaisala | raso | 1 | p | t | gap flow | Sterzing | |
| Austria | ZAMG | Doppler sodar | 1 | p | t | PBL, gap | Brenner | |
| UK | Uni Leeds | micro barograph | 8 | u | t | Foehn, gap flow | Brenner | |
| USA | NOAA | scanning Doppler lidar | 1 | p | t | gap flow | Brenner |

Figure 3-11. Tentative layout of Brenner target area for gap flow studies.
Table 3-9 presents a summary of the research aircraft proposed for participation in MAP. Their availability is very likely. The anticipated use of the individual aircraft for the scientific projects presented in chapter 2 together with the prominent instrumentation is also summarized in Table 3-9. Some general characteristics are summarized in Table 3-10 and visualized as "endurance-ceiling scatterplot" in Figure 3-12.
Table 3-9. Proposed research aircraft
country |
group |
instrument |
fs |
Projects |
special |
availability / |
| USA | NCAR / INSU | Electra | p | P1; P4; P6; P7 | Eldora/Astraia, SABL, dropsondes, microphysics | 15. Aug to 15 Nov.; ~25 missions, 3x60h/mt |
| USA | NOAA | P-3 | p | P1; P4; P7 | Doppler radar, dropsondes, microphysics |
15 Sept to 15 Nov; ~15 missions, 2x60h/mt |
| Germany | IPA DLR | Falcon | p | P2; P6 | dropsondes, backscatter and H2O lidar, Doppler lidar (WIND) | 2-3 weeks; 5-6 missions, 30h |
| France | Météo France | Merlin | ok | P4; P5; P7 | in situ instruments for mean flow and turbulence measurements | 2 months; 15 missions of 4 hours |
| France | INSU | Fokker ARAT | ok | P1; P4; P7 | water vapour lidar: (LEANDRE 2) | 2 months; 20 missions of 3 hours |
| UK | UKMO | C-130 | p | P6; P7 | dropsondes, | 2 weeks from 31 Oct to 14 Nov; ~4-5 missions, ~25h |
| Switzerland | Metair AG | Stemme S10VC | p | P5; P8 | 20h for P5; 40h for P8 | |
| Austria | Military Service | Pilatus Porter | u | P5 | basic instrumentation | 15.8.-15.11., 30 hours |
Table 3-10. General characteristics of the aircraft.
| Aircraft | Ceiling | Endurance | Range | Payload |
| Electra | 28400ft | 7.5h (IBK) *) | 1500nmi at 1000ft 2400nmi at 20000ft |
9300kg max. 3300kg (full fuel) |
| P-3 | 27000ft | 7.5h (IBK) *) | 2000nmi | N.N. |
| Falcon | 41000ft | 5h | 2000nmi | 1000kg |
| Merlin | 26000ft | 5h max. | 1100nmi at 23000ft | 800kg |
| Fokker ARAT | 20000ft | 3.5h max. | 600nmi at 20000ft | 3150kg 2600kg (full fuel) |
| C-130 UK | 31000ft | 11h at ceiling 12h max. |
3000nmi at 22000ft | 29000kg (typical) 17600kg (full fuel) |
| Stemme S10VC |
16000ft | 7h max. | 700nmi | 310kg max. (100kg equip-ment) |
| Pilatus Porter | 25,000ft | 4h | 500nmi | 800kg |
*) endurance adapted to runway length in Innsbruck (IBK)

Figure 3-12. Ceiling versus endurance of the aircraft listed in Table 3-10
(approximate). FA: Falcon; E: Electra; ME: Merlin; FO: Fokker ARAT; S10: Stemme
S10VC; PP: Pilatus Porter.
Geostationary satellite coverage of the MAP area will be ensured by two METEOSAT spacecraft. The normal half-hourly image dissemination will be provided by METEOSAT 7, which will be the operational satellite at the time of the SOP (positioned at 0° longitude). METEOSAT 6, the back-up satellite, will be situated at 10° W and carry out rapid scans of the MAP area on demand. The rapid scan image data will be rectified to 0° degrees. The main interest is in rapid scanning with six or eight scans per 30 minutes. The current preference is for six rapid scans, that is an image repetition time of about 5 min providing the full-disk lines between approximately 39°N and 56° N latitude. A typical image of the infrared channel is shown in Fig. 3-13 a and the corresponding sea-land mask in Fig. 3-13 b.
![]() |
![]() |
Figure 3-13. METEOSAT infrared sample image (upper panel) for the radpid scan
strategy and
corresponding sea-land mask (lower panel)
The period of rapid scanning will be requested by the MAP mission selection team with a lead time around 24 hours. It will probably not be possible to operate METEOSAT 6 in a permanent imaging mode, since the equipment used for MAP processing will also be used to provide redundancy for the prime operational and the INDOEX missions. It is foreseen to start imaging by METEOSAT 6 approximately six hours before the time requested for rapid scan coverage, in order to allow a sufficient warm-up phase for the image rectification system to stabilise. Then rapid scanning lasts for a period of about six hours. This period may be extended if the rapid scanning mode is interrupted to acquire one or two nominal images to stabilize the rectification algorithm. Rapid scans can be requested for any time of the day.
Scientific needs for a METEOSAT rapid scan strategy during MAP can be seen in several aspects, namely deep convection monitoring, satellite wind field extraction, rainfall estimation and mesoscale analysis. Observations conducted by means of rapid scan from GOES-8/9 over the U.S. Great Plains have already contributed to document mechanism of storm evolution. Rapid scans of the order of 5 min by METEOSAT will greatly improve the monitoring of deep convective cloud formation and evolution within the MAP area. High-frequency METEOSAT imagery over the MAP area can contribute to wind derivation tests for ingestion into forecast models. Infrared precipitation estimation methods will be tested against an unprecedented data set of rain gauge and radar measurements. High-frequency scanning strategies give the possibility of obtaining rainfall maps at time intervals approaching the radar frequency. Better statistics and calibration are considered achievable. High-resolution mesoscale models will benefit from the availability of cloudiness and cloud temperature maps at a few minutes interval. Last but not least the availability of frequent scans in the water vapour channel is important for the analysis of convergence/divergence in the upper air structures. PV streamer research and upper-tropospheric feature studies, in general, will benefit from such images.
![]()